Comparison of 2 Perioperative Management Protocols and Their Influence on Postoperative Recovery after Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Standard Parenteral Nutrition, Selective Bowel Decontamination and Suprapubic Catheters?

• Published in: Digestive surgery Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 394 - 401
• Main Authors: Elekonawo, Fortuné M.K., van der Meeren, Manon M.D., Simkens, Geert A., de Wilt, Johannes H.W., de Hingh, Ignace H., Bremers, Andreas J.A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel, Switzerland 01.08.2019
• Subjects: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Cefazolin - therapeutic use; Ceftriaxone - therapeutic use; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures - adverse effects; Decontamination; Female; Humans; Hyperthermia, Induced; Ileus - etiology; Infusions, Parenteral; Intestines - microbiology; Intestines - physiopathology; Length of Stay; Male; Metronidazole - therapeutic use; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Original Paper; Parenteral Nutrition; Perioperative Care - methods; Recovery of Function; Retrospective Studies; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology; Urinary Catheterization - methods; Netherlands; Hyperthermic intraperitoneal; Chemotherapy; Postoperative recovery; Perioperative care protocol
• ISSN: 0253-4886; 1421-9883
• DOI: 10.1159/000490068

Background: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is associated with considerable postoperative morbidity, including ileus and infectious complications. Perioperative care is believed to be an important factor for the development and treatment of postoperative morbidity. Patients and Methods: Data on case-matched patients from a retrospective database of 2 Dutch HIPEC centres was compared. Patient selection and procedures were identical in both hospitals although perioperative management items differ slightly. In centre B, immediate total parenteral nutrition (TPN), suprapubic urine bladder catheter placement (SPCs) and selective decontamination of the digestive-tract are standard care for CRS-HIPEC patients, while in centre A, they are not. Results: From a total of 223 patients, 68 consecutive patients from centre B were compared to 68 matched patients from centre A. TPN was administered to 54.4% of patients in centre A because of prolonged ileus, whereas it was standard of care in centre B. In all, 105 (77.2%) patients experienced postoperative complications including 17.6% who had a grades III–IV complication. The incidence of grade III-V complications was 18 (26.4%) in centre A and 8 (11.8%) in centre B (p = 0.03). Median hospital stay was 12 days (7–84) in A and 11(6–80) in centre B (p = 0.546). Conclusions: Gastrointestinal recovery after CRS-HIPEC seems to take longer as compared to other surgical procedures. Between the 2 centres, a significant difference in severe complications was found, while standard TPN, selective bowel decontamination and SPCs were the only identified differences in perioperative care.