Effects of neutralizing agents on lactic acid production by Rhizopus oryzae using sweet potato starch

A neutralizing agent is usually employed to counteract the pH reduction during lactic acid fermentation by Rhizopus oryzae. Calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) is used as such a pH controlling agent. The low solubility of CaCO₃ in the fermentation broth could however lead to low efficiency in pH control and c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 437 - 441
Main Authors Yen, Hong-Wei, Chen, Tsia-Ju, Pan, Wei-Chin, Wu, Hsien-Jen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dordrecht Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands 01.03.2010
Springer Netherlands
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A neutralizing agent is usually employed to counteract the pH reduction during lactic acid fermentation by Rhizopus oryzae. Calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) is used as such a pH controlling agent. The low solubility of CaCO₃ in the fermentation broth could however lead to low efficiency in pH control and cause problems in the subsequent purification process. Therefore, an alternative agent in place of CaCO₃ was examined in this study. The effect of four different neutralizing agents, including CaCO₃, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ammoniacal solution and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO₃) on lactic acid production and the morphology of the pellets were investigated. Results indicated that CaCO₃ was still the preferred choice, because of the pellet morphology and the highest lactic acid concentration (43.3 g/L) obtained in the batch using 60 g/L of sweet potato starch as feedstock. It is noteworthy that the lactic acid purification is relatively easier when using NaHCO₃ instead of CaCO₃, due to the higher solubility of sodium lactate than calcium lactate. Therefore, even the batch with CaCO₃ had a slightly higher productivity (1.23 g/L/h) than the batch with NaHCO₃ (1.14 g/L/h), NaHCO₃ might be the first choice for process designers whenever recovery is vital.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0186-0
ISSN:0959-3993
1573-0972
DOI:10.1007/s11274-009-0186-0