Socioeconomic inequality in organized and opportunistic screening for colorectal cancer: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2009-2021

• Published in: Epidemiology and health Vol. 45; p. e2023086
• Main Authors: Luu, Xuan Quy, Lee, Kyeongmin, Jun, Jae Kwan, Suh, Mina, Choi, Kui Son
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Korean Society of Epidemiology 2023
• Subjects: colorectal cancer; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology; Early Detection of Cancer; health inequities; Health Status Disparities; Healthcare Disparities; healthcare disparity; Humans; mass screening; Original; Republic of Korea - epidemiology; Socioeconomic Factors; Republic of Korea; Mass screening; Health inequities; Healthcare disparity; Colorectal cancer
• ISSN: 2092-7193; 2092-7193
• DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2023086

This study aimed to investigate socioeconomic status (SES)-based inequality in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Korea. We assessed whether the rates of opportunistic and organized CRC screening differed according to income and education levels. We analyzed data from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey of 27,654 cancer-free individuals, aged 50-74 years, from 2009 to 2021. The weighted cancer screening rates with trends were estimated with the average annual percentage change using joinpoint regression. Inequality was calculated in both relative and absolute terms, based on a Poisson regression model. The organized screening rate increased significantly from 22.1% in 2009 to 53.1% in 2020 and 50.6% in 2021, with an average annual change of 8.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9 to 12.5). In contrast, no significant trend was observed for opportunistic screening. The SES inequality in opportunistic screening uptake was indicated by a slope index of inequality (SII) of 9.74% (95% CI, 6.36 to 13.12), relative index of inequality (RII) of 2.18 (95% CI, 1.75 to 2.70) in terms of education level; and an SII of 7.03% (95% CI, 4.09 to 9.98), RII of 1.81 (95% CI, 1.41 to 2.31) in terms of measured income. Although there was an increasing trend in income inequality, no significant SES inequalities were observed in the overall estimates for organized screening. Organized CRC screening is effective in improving the participation rate, regardless of SES. However, significant inequalities were found in opportunistic screening, suggesting room for improvement in the overall equity of CRC screening.