Flexible learning in teacher education: myths, muddles and models

While there has been widespread take-up of the concept 'flexible learning' within various educational environments-and equally frequent references to the flexible 'natures' of the computer and communication technologies that often underpin flexible learning initiatives-the relati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAsia-Pacific journal of teacher education Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 213 - 226
Main Authors Bigum, Chris, Rowan, Leonie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Taylor and Francis Ltd 01.11.2004
Taylor & Francis Group Journals
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:While there has been widespread take-up of the concept 'flexible learning' within various educational environments-and equally frequent references to the flexible 'natures' of the computer and communication technologies that often underpin flexible learning initiatives-the relationship between technologies and flexibility is not a simple one. In this paper we examine some of the more persistent myths about technologies that are intertwined with discourses of flexibility. We highlight some of the more common 'muddles' that these myths can lead us in to and argue that the 'mess' that so often results from well-intentioned moves to 'be more flexible' is largely a result of the ways that CCTs, or indeed any new educational technology or strategy, is theorized. Drawing on a recent study of online teaching and learning in higher education, we outline a new framework for examining these and related issues as they apply to teacher education.
Bibliography:Refereed article. Includes bibliographical references.
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education; v.32 n.3 p.213-226; November 2004
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, v.32, no.3, Nov 2004: (213)-226
ISSN:1359-866X
1469-2945
DOI:10.1080/1359866042000295389