Exploring the design space of mixed swing quadrail for low-power digital circuits

This paper describes and explores the design space of a mixed voltage swing methodology for lowering the energy per switching operation of digital circuits in standard submicron complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) fabrication processes. Employing mixed voltage swings expands the degrees o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on very large scale integration (VLSI) systems Vol. 5; no. 4; pp. 388 - 400
Main Authors Krishnamurthy, R.K., Carley, L.R.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Piscataway, NJ IEEE 01.12.1997
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1063-8210
1557-9999
DOI10.1109/92.645065

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper describes and explores the design space of a mixed voltage swing methodology for lowering the energy per switching operation of digital circuits in standard submicron complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) fabrication processes. Employing mixed voltage swings expands the degrees of freedom available in the power-delay optimization space of static CMOS circuits. In order to study this design space and evaluate the power-delay tradeoffs, analytical polynomial formulations for power and delay of mixed swing circuits are derived and HSPICE simulation results are presented to demonstrate their accuracy. Efficient voltage scaling and transistor sizing techniques based on our analytical formulations are proposed for optimizing energy/operation subject to target delay constraints; up to 2.2/spl times/ improvement in energy/operation is demonstrated for an ISCAS'85 benchmark circuit using these techniques. Experimental results from HSPICE simulations and measurements from an And-Or-Invert (AO1222) test chip fabricated in the Hewlett-Packard 0.5 /spl mu/m process are presented to demonstrate up to 2,92/spl times/ energy/operation savings for optimized mixed swing circuits compared to static CMOS.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1063-8210
1557-9999
DOI:10.1109/92.645065