Evaluation of fixed-dose versus variable-dose prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal

The purpose was to compare hemostatic efficacy rates for fixed- and variable-dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for warfarin reversal. Retrospective study of patients with non-intracranial major bleeding or undergoing emergent surgery/procedure who received 4F-PCC for warfarin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThrombosis research Vol. 214; pp. 76 - 81
Main Authors Bajdas, Haley, Handzel, Michele, Uttaro, Elizabeth, Jones, Courtney M.C., Kokanovich, Kate, Acquisto, Nicole M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose was to compare hemostatic efficacy rates for fixed- and variable-dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for warfarin reversal. Retrospective study of patients with non-intracranial major bleeding or undergoing emergent surgery/procedure who received 4F-PCC for warfarin reversal from September 2013 through August 2020. Hemostatic efficacy at 48 h following fixed- or variable-dose 4F-PCC was evaluated using modified International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria for major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of post-4F-PCC INR ≤ 1.5, in-hospital mortality, time to 4F-PCC administration, and 4F-PCC cost. Univariate analyses were completed and logistic regression used to identify patient-specific factors associated with hemostatic efficacy. A total of 265 patients, 90 (34%) fixed- and 175 (66%) variable-dose 4F-PCC, were included. Hemostatic efficacy was achieved in 34 (37.8%) and 38 (21.7%) in fixed- and variable-dose groups, respectively, p = 0.005. Achievement of INR ≤ 1.5 occurred in 55 (62.5%) in the fixed- and 120 (69.4%) in the variable-dose groups, p = 0.26, and there was no in-hospital mortality difference. Time to administration was a mean 20 min faster and cost was reduced by a mean $1881/dose in the fixed-dose group. The unadjusted odds of achieving hemostatic efficacy was 2.27 among those receiving fixed-dose compared to variable-dose 4F-PCC (95% CI 1.30, 3.98); this was not confounded by initial INR or patient weight. Fixed-dose 4F-PCC is associated with a higher likelihood of achieving hemostatic efficacy, quicker time to administration, and reduced cost compared to variable-dose 4F-PCC for warfarin reversal. [Display omitted]
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0049-3848
1879-2472
DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2022.04.015