Religion as Anthropomorphism: A New Theory that Invites Definitional and Epistemic Scrutiny

• Published in: Religion (London. 1971) Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 31 - 34
• Main Author: Yonan, Edward A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kent Elsevier Ltd 01.01.1995; Taylor & Francis Group; Elsevier; Academic Press; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Anthropology; Anthropomorphism; Epistemology; General subjects. History of religions. Religious anthropology; Guthrie, Stewart; History and sciences of religions; Literary criticism; Philosophy; Religion; Studies in religion; Religious anthropology; Epistemology; Theory; Anthropomorphism
• ISSN: 0048-721X; 1096-1151
• DOI: 10.1006/reli.1995.0004

This essay will focus briefly on (1) a definitional and (2) an epistemic analysis of Stewart Guthrie's cultural-anthropological theory of anthropomorphism in his bookFaces in the Clouds. In Part I of the essay, I will examine specific definitional claims about religion that Guthrie advances in chapter 1 (‘The Need for a Theory’) and chapter 3 (‘The Origin of Anthropomorphism’). In Part II, crucial statements in chapter 6 (‘Anthropomorphism in Philosophy and Science’) and chapter 7 (‘Religion as Anthropomorphism’) raise questions about Guthrie's epistemic assumptions that in philosophy and science the objects referred to as anthropomorphic have critically been known to be errors and have been wisely set aside in the margins of those enterprises, whereas the objects referred to as anthropomorphic in religion have always been at the centre of religion. Guthrie employs five theoretical criteria (of observability, simplicity, generality, fallibility, and probability) to explain why religion always anthropomorphizes. The essay concludes with a formal question about the epistemic status of Guthrie's observability and universality criteria.