Effects of a Passive Back-Support Exosuit on Erector Spinae and Abdominal Muscle Activity During Short-Duration, Asymmetric Trunk Posture Maintenance Tasks

• Published in: Human factors Vol. 66; no. 7; pp. 1830 - 1843
• Main Authors: Kang, Sang Hyeon, Mirka, Gary A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.07.2024; Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
• Subjects: Abdominal Muscles - physiology; Adult; Asymmetry; Biomechanical Phenomena - physiology; Biomechanics; Constrictions; Effectiveness; Electromyography; Exoskeleton; Exoskeleton Device; Exoskeletons; Female; Humans; Lower Extremity - physiology; Maintenance; Male; Mobility; Muscle contraction; Muscle function; Muscles; Paraspinal Muscles - physiology; Posture; Posture - physiology; Restrictions; Torso - physiology; Trunk muscles; Young Adult; exoskeleton; asymmetry; exosuit; surgical ergonomics; EMG
• ISSN: 0018-7208; 1547-8181
• DOI: 10.1177/00187208231197264

Objective To examine the effects of asymmetry and lower extremity mobility restrictions on the effectiveness of a passive back-support exosuit in short-duration, static trunk flexion postures. Background The effectiveness of trunk exoskeletons/suits for sagittally symmetric trunk posture maintenance has been investigated, but there has been limited study of the effects of asymmetric trunk postures or lower extremity motion restriction. Method Sixteen participants held trunk flexion postures involving trunk flexion (20°, 40°, 60°), asymmetry (0°, 30°), and lower extremity mobility (Free, Restricted) for 3 s. Participants held these postures with and without an exosuit while erector spinae and abdominal muscle activities were collected. Results There were no significant interactions between exosuit and asymmetry or exosuit and lower extremity motion restrictions, indicating no significant effects of these factors on the effectiveness of the exosuit at reducing trunk muscle activity. The exosuit was found to be effective at reducing erector spinae muscle activity regardless of asymmetry of posture or lower extremity restrictions (average 21%, from 11.2% MVC to 8.8% MVC). The magnitude of the erector spinae activity at 60° of trunk flexion with the exosuit was similar to that seen at 20° without the exosuit. Conclusion The exosuit consistently provided biomechanical benefit through reduced activation of the erector spinae muscles and neither asymmetry of trunk posture nor lower extremity restriction influenced this effectiveness. Application Trunk exoskeletons/suits can reduce trunk muscle activation and understanding how characteristics of the trunk postures assumed impact these responses may help target tasks wherein these devices may be effective.