Deposition of aluminide and silicide based protective coatings on niobium

We compare aluminide and alumino-silicide composite coatings on niobium using halide activated pack cementation (HAPC) technique for improving its oxidation resistance. The coated samples are characterized by SEM, EDS, EPMA and hardness measurements. We observe formation of NbAl3 in aluminide coatin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied surface science Vol. 257; no. 2; pp. 635 - 640
Main Authors Majumdar, S., Arya, A., Sharma, I.G., Suri, A.K., Banerjee, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.11.2010
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We compare aluminide and alumino-silicide composite coatings on niobium using halide activated pack cementation (HAPC) technique for improving its oxidation resistance. The coated samples are characterized by SEM, EDS, EPMA and hardness measurements. We observe formation of NbAl3 in aluminide coating of Nb, though the alumino-silicide coating leads to formation primarily of NbSi2 in the inner layer and a ternary compound of Nb–Si–Al in the outer layer, as reported earlier (Majumdar et al. [11]). Formation of niobium silicide is preferred over niobium aluminide during alumino-silicide coating experiments, indicating Si is more strongly bonded to Nb than Al, although equivalent quantities of aluminium and silicon powders were used in the pack chemistry. We also employ first-principles density functional pseudopotential-based calculations to calculate the relative stability of these intermediate phases and the adhesion strength of the Al/Nb and Si/Nb interfaces. NbSi2 exhibits much stronger covalent character as compared to NbAl3. The ideal work of adhesion for the relaxed Al/Nb and Si/Nb interfaces are calculated to be 3226mJ/m2 and 3545mJ/m2, respectively, indicating stronger Nb–Si bonding across the interface.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0169-4332
1873-5584
DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.055