Nocturnal motor activity and light exposure: Objective actigraphy-based marks of melancholic and non-melancholic depressive disorder. Brief report

Differentiation of melancholic (MEL) and non-melancholic (N-MEL) depression results from subjective assessment of psychomotor disturbance, which obscures their accurate diagnosis. CORE instrument assigned participants with severe or refractory depression to MEL or N-MEL group. Participants underwent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPsychiatry research Vol. 258; pp. 587 - 590
Main Authors Tonon, André Comiran, Fuchs, Daniel Fernando Paludo, Barbosa Gomes, William, Levandovski, Rosa, Pio de Almeida Fleck, Marcelo, Hidalgo, Maria Paz Loayza, da Silva Alencastro, Luciano
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.12.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Differentiation of melancholic (MEL) and non-melancholic (N-MEL) depression results from subjective assessment of psychomotor disturbance, which obscures their accurate diagnosis. CORE instrument assigned participants with severe or refractory depression to MEL or N-MEL group. Participants underwent 7 days of actigraphy. Data was fitted to a cosinusoidal curve corresponding to a 24-h rhythm. Nocturnal activity was significantly higher in N-MEL. ROC curve shows that average night activity discriminate participants with 71% sensitivity and 100% specificity (area under the curve = 0.84). Actigraphy contribute to the objective differentiation of depression subtypes, and have implications for research on their neurobiology and clinical management. [Display omitted] •Nocturnal activity differentiates melancholic from non-melancholic depression.•Patterns of activity differ between groups, regardless of the severity of symptoms.•Actigraphy can objectively assess melancholic features.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-1781
1872-7123
DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.025