DNP scholarly projects: Unintended consequences for academic-practice partnerships

• Published in: Journal of professional nursing Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 516 - 520
• Main Authors: Vessey, Judith A., Wentzell, Katherine, Wendt, Judith, Glynn, Donna
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2021
• Subjects: Academic-practice partnerships; Collaboration; Doctor of nursing practice; Nursing; Professional ethics; Scholarly projects; Doctor of nursing practice; Academic-practice partnerships; Scholarly projects; Professional ethics; Collaboration
• ISSN: 8755-7223; 1532-8481
• DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.03.007

With the rapid proliferation of Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs, academic-practice partnerships are critical in the implementation of rigorous and valuable scholarly projects. However, the failure to develop meaningful partnerships can have unintended consequences, particularly when students and practice sites do not have the preparation and support to navigate these partnerships. Four case studies are presented that explore the issues of preserving autonomy, practicing stewardship, imposing unfair burden and maintaining project fidelity. Best practices are presented to promote equitable collaboration and a mutually beneficial experience. Universities must have the resources required to generate expert clinicians able to translate research into practice and support effective academic-practice partnerships. •Academic-practice partnerships are critical for successful DNP scholarly projects.•Disparate requirements and minimal support from universities can impact execution.•Open, ongoing communication fosters development of mutually beneficial projects.