Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with Edwards SAPIEN 3 and XT in smaller Asian anatomy

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using Edwards SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve and SAPIEN XT) in smaller anatomy. The new generation S3 TAVI device has been used worldwide; however, its efficacy and safety in smaller Asian anatomy remain unknown. Betw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 384 - 390
Main Authors Nakashima, Makoto, Watanabe, Yusuke, Hioki, Hirofumi, Nara, Yugo, Nagura, Fukuko, Hosogoe, Naoyoshi, Kawashima, Hideyuki, Kataoka, Akihisa, Otsuki, Shuji, Konno, Kumiko, Kyono, Hiroyuki, Yokoyama, Naoyuki, Kozuma, Ken
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Springer Japan 01.10.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using Edwards SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve and SAPIEN XT) in smaller anatomy. The new generation S3 TAVI device has been used worldwide; however, its efficacy and safety in smaller Asian anatomy remain unknown. Between February 2014 and March 2017, 166 consecutive patients (S3, 54; XT, 112) were treated with balloon-expandable TAVI in a single center and their outcomes were analyzed. Median patient age was 85 (range: 81–88) years and mean body surface area was 1.41 ± 0.15 m 2 . A 23-mm size valve was used in S3 and XT groups (70 vs. 62%, p  = 0.224). The transfemoral approach was more frequently used in the S3 than in the XT group (96 vs. 72%, p  < 0.001). Although, the minimal luminal diameter of the femoral artery was smaller in the S3 group (5.9 vs. 6.4 mm, p  = 0.001), the rates of major (2 vs. 11%, p  = 0.226) and minor (11 vs. 5%, p  = 0.107) vascular complications did not increase. The frequency of paravalvular leaks (PVL) ≥ 2 was significantly reduced in the S3 group (11 vs. 61%, p  < 0.001); however, pre- (24 vs. 91%, p  < 0.001) and post- (4 vs. 19%, p  < 0.001) dilatations were less frequently performed. Pacemaker implantation incidence did not increase (4 vs. 5%, p  = 1.0) and peak velocity of the transcatheter heart valve was significantly higher in the S3 group (2.3 vs. 2.2 m/s, p  = 0.046). Device success was high (89 vs. 93%, p  = 0.387) while the 30-day all-cause mortality was low (2 vs. 1%, p  = 0.583) in both groups. TAVI with the S3 device was safe and effective, with low incidence of vascular complications and reduced PVL, in smaller body-sized Asians.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1868-4300
1868-4297
DOI:10.1007/s12928-017-0502-9