Characterization of the key odorants contributing to retronasal olfaction during bread consumption

•Retronasal olfaction was explored by GC–IMS combined with D-QDA sensory evaluation.•Sweet, creamy, and roasty notes were the most active attributes during mastication.•Acetoin, 2,3-butanedione, and 3-(methylthio)propanal were the 3 key odorants.•Two key odorants were 30% lost during delivery from m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood chemistry Vol. 318; p. 126520
Main Authors Pu, Dandan, Duan, Wen, Huang, Yan, Zhang, Yuyu, Sun, Baoguo, Ren, Fazheng, Zhang, Huiying, Chen, Haitao, He, Jinna, Tang, Yizhuang
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 15.07.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Retronasal olfaction was explored by GC–IMS combined with D-QDA sensory evaluation.•Sweet, creamy, and roasty notes were the most active attributes during mastication.•Acetoin, 2,3-butanedione, and 3-(methylthio)propanal were the 3 key odorants.•Two key odorants were 30% lost during delivery from mouth to retronasal cavity. Gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry (GC–IMS) and dynamic quantitative descriptive analysis (D-QDA) were combined to explore the aroma release and perception from the retronasal cavity during bread consumption. D-QDA results elucidated that the sweet, creamy, and roasty notes were the most active attributes during oral processing. The final stage of oral processing had the most complicated changing pattern, followed by the intermediate and initial stages. Thirteen aroma compounds were detected in the retronasal cavity, of which eight had odor activity values (OAVs) greater than 1. The total OAV changing pattern was consistent with the D-QDA results. Addition experiments further confirmed that acetoin, 2,3-butanedione, and 3-(methylthio)propanal were key aroma compounds contributing to retronasal olfaction. 2,3-Butanedione and 3-(methylthio)propanal were both identified as key odorants in the mouth cavity and retronasal cavity during oral processing, but they had 30% loss during the breath delivery from the mouth cavity to the retronasal cavity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126520