Neural generators of the auditory evoked potential components P3a and P3b

The aim of the present study was to define the scalp topography of the two subcomponents of the P3 component of the auditory evoked potential elicited in a three-stimulus oddball paradigm and to identify their cortical generators using the standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLOR...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa neurobiologiae experimentalis Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 51 - 64
Main Authors Wronka, Eligiusz, Kaiser, Jan, Coenen, Anton
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Poland 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0065-1400
1689-0035
1689-0035
DOI10.55782/ane-2012-1880

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of the present study was to define the scalp topography of the two subcomponents of the P3 component of the auditory evoked potential elicited in a three-stimulus oddball paradigm and to identify their cortical generators using the standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA). Subjects were presented with a random sequence of auditory stimuli and instructed to respond to an infrequently occurring target stimulus inserted into a sequence of frequent standard and rare non-target stimuli. Results show that the magnitude of the frontal P3a is determined by the relative physical difference among stimuli, as it was larger for the stimulus more deviant from the standard. Major neural generators of the P3a were localized within frontal cortex and anterior cingulate gyrus. In contrast to this, the P3b, showing maximal amplitude at parietal locations, was larger for stimuli demanding a response than for the rare non-target. Major sources of the P3b included the superior parietal lobule and the posterior part of the cingulate gyrus. Our findings are in line with the hypothesis that P3a is related to alerting activity during the initial allocation of attention, while P3b is related to activation of a posterior network when the neuronal model of perceived stimulation is compared with the attentional trace.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0065-1400
1689-0035
1689-0035
DOI:10.55782/ane-2012-1880