Structural and chemical properties of sputter-deposited Ti–Ge–N thin films
Ti–Ge–N single-layer and TiN/GeN-multilayer thin films were deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering on Si and WC–Co substrates at constant temperature T s = 240 °C, from confocal Ti and Ge targets in a mixed Ar/N 2 atmosphere. The nitrogen partial pressure, the TiN deposition time t Ti and the po...
Saved in:
Published in | Surface & coatings technology Vol. 200; no. 5; pp. 1483 - 1488 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Lausanne
Elsevier B.V
21.11.2005
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Ti–Ge–N single-layer and TiN/GeN-multilayer thin films were deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering on Si and WC–Co substrates at constant temperature
T
s
=
240 °C, from confocal Ti and Ge targets in a mixed Ar/N
2 atmosphere. The nitrogen partial pressure, the TiN deposition time
t
Ti and the power on the Ti and Ge targets were kept constant. In order to obtain various GeN layer thicknesses in the films, the deposition time ratio
t
Ge/
t
Ti was varied. TiN/GeN multilayer films with TiN thickness ∼
5 nm and various GeN thicknesses between 0.5 and 5 nm were deposited. A nanocrystalline multilayer film is formed, where the suppression of crystal growth is controlled by the successive deposition of two phases. TEM investigations revealed important changes induced by GeN
x
thickness variation: the columnar single-layer morphology switches into a multilayer morphology. The critical GeN thickness for changing the type of morphology is controlled by the diffusion of Ge atoms at the TiN crystallite boundaries. The morphology modification from single-layer to multilayer type determines the film hardening. Electron probe microanalyses (EPMA), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nanoindentation and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques were employed to characterize single- and multilayer films. The properties of alternate-deposited films are compared to those of co-deposited ones and interpreted. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-2 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Conference Paper-1 content type line 23 SourceType-Conference Papers & Proceedings-1 ObjectType-Article-3 |
ISSN: | 0257-8972 1879-3347 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.08.056 |