Accurately calibrated frequency domain diffuse optical spectroscopy compared against chemical analysis of porcine adipose tissue

• Published in: Journal of biophotonics Vol. 14; no. 12; pp. e202100169 - n/a
• Main Authors: Lam, Jesse H., Tu, Kelsey J., Kim, Sehwan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Weinheim WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA 01.12.2021; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Adipose Tissue; Analytical chemistry; Animals; Calibration; Chemical analysis; diffuse optical spectroscopy; Frequency domain analysis; Hemodynamics; Humans; Phantoms, Imaging; porcine adipose; Silicones; Spectroscopy; Spectrum Analysis; Swine; tissue lipid; tissue water; Water; tissue water; porcine adipose; calibration; tissue lipid; chemical analysis; diffuse optical spectroscopy
• ISSN: 1864-063X; 1864-0648; 1864-0648
• DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202100169

Frequency domain diffuse optical spectroscopy (fdDOS) is a noninvasive technique to estimate tissue composition and hemodynamics. While fdDOS has been established as a valuable modality for clinical research, comparison of fdDOS with direct chemical analysis (CA) methods has yet to be reported. To compare the two approaches, we propose a procedure to confirm accurate calibration by use of liquid emulsion and solid silicone phantoms. Tissue fat (FAT) and water (H2O) content of two ex vivo porcine tissue samples were optically measured by fdDOS and compared to CA values. We show an average H2O error (fdDOS minus CA) and SD of 1.9 ± 0.2% and −0.9 ± 0.2% for the two samples. For FAT, we report a mean error of −9.3 ± 1.3% and 0.8 ± 1.3%. We also measured various body sites of a healthy human subject using fdDOS with results suggesting that accurate calibration may improve device sensitivity. Frequency domain diffuse optical spectroscopy (fdDOS) is a technique which can non‐invasively quantify the water and fat content of tissues. Decomposition of biological material into these basic components using chemical analysis (CA) is also a known technique in the nutrition industry, but has yet to be compared to fdDOS. In this study, we utilize both CA and fdDOS on porcine adipose tissue following a method to verify accurate fdDOS calibration.