Classification of South African Bread Wheat Cultivars According to Hagberg Falling Number Reaction to Fertilizer Treatment

The effect of three fertilizer treatments (suboptimal = 0 N, P, K kg/ha; standard = 20 N, 5 P, 5 K kg/ha; and optimal = 60 N, 15 P, and 15 K kg/ha) on the Hagberg Falling Number (HFN) of 15 South African bread wheats were investigated. No statistical significant effect on the HFN of wheat in general...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCereal chemistry Vol. 84; no. 3; pp. 214 - 219
Main Authors Craven, M, Barnard, A, Otto, W, Labuschagne, M.T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published St. Paul, MN The American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc 01.05.2007
American Association of Cereal Chemists
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effect of three fertilizer treatments (suboptimal = 0 N, P, K kg/ha; standard = 20 N, 5 P, 5 K kg/ha; and optimal = 60 N, 15 P, and 15 K kg/ha) on the Hagberg Falling Number (HFN) of 15 South African bread wheats were investigated. No statistical significant effect on the HFN of wheat in general could be seen. A split-plot analysis, however, indicated a cultivar effect for HFN response to fertilizer treatment. This allowed for the grouping of cultivars into four response groups: low, low-to-medium, medium, and high, according to HFN sensitivity to fertilizer treatment. A canonical variate analysis (CVA) was performed on the general performance of each cultivar with regard to three characteristics: yield, protein content, and HFN. This allowed for the refinement of risk groups as created by the split-plot analysis for HFN response. However, HFN measured were never below the 220 sec cut-off mark for grade.
ISSN:0009-0352
1943-3638
DOI:10.1094/CCHEM-84-3-0214