EvalBench: A Software Library for Visualization Evaluation

It is generally acknowledged in visualization research that it is necessary to evaluate visualization artifacts in order to provide empirical evidence on their effectiveness and efficiency as well as their usability and utility. However, the difficulties of conducting such evaluations still remain a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inComputer graphics forum Vol. 32; no. 3pt1; pp. 41 - 50
Main Authors Aigner, W., Hoffmann, S., Rind, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0167-7055
1467-8659
DOI10.1111/cgf.12091

Cover

More Information
Summary:It is generally acknowledged in visualization research that it is necessary to evaluate visualization artifacts in order to provide empirical evidence on their effectiveness and efficiency as well as their usability and utility. However, the difficulties of conducting such evaluations still remain an issue. Apart from the required know‐how to appropriately design and conduct user studies, the necessary implementation effort for evaluation features in visualization software is a considerable obstacle. To mitigate this, we present EvalBench, an easy‐to‐use, flexible, and reusable software library for visualization evaluation written in Java. We describe its design choices and basic ions of our conceptual architecture and demonstrate its applicability by a number of case studies. EvalBench reduces implementation effort for evaluation features and makes conducting user studies easier. It can be used and integrated with third‐party visualization prototypes that need to be evaluated via loose coupling. EvalBench supports both, quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods such as controlled experiments, interaction logging, laboratory questionnaires, heuristic evaluations, and insight diaries.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-70R2G1JS-6
ArticleID:CGF12091
istex:A16DDDA26FD21011338CE6667B5C63A15EAB74C4
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-7055
1467-8659
DOI:10.1111/cgf.12091