Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology

Prasada and Pinker's (1993) subjects provided past tense forms of nonce verbs. The subject's willingness to provide irregular past tense forms correlated with the verb's phonological similarity to existing irregular English verbs. However, there was no correlation between the number o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLingua Vol. 110; no. 4; pp. 281 - 298
Main Author Eddington, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.04.2000
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0024-3841
1872-6135
DOI10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00043-1

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Prasada and Pinker's (1993) subjects provided past tense forms of nonce verbs. The subject's willingness to provide irregular past tense forms correlated with the verb's phonological similarity to existing irregular English verbs. However, there was no correlation between the number of nonce verbs assigned regular inflection, and the verb's similarity to existing regular verbs. According to the dual-route model, this is expected since irregular items are stored in associative memory, while regular items take an allomorph of - ed by rule. A singleroute connectionist simulation failed to duplicate the subject's behavior on regular verbs. Two instance-based models were applied to the data: Analogical Modeling of Language and the Tilburg Memory Based Learner. Each model employed a similarity algorithm to determine the behavior of all regular and irregular items. Both models successfully mirrored the subject's responses. Therefore, the data are consistent with an instance-based single-route model of morphology.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0024-3841
1872-6135
DOI:10.1016/S0024-3841(99)00043-1