Faculty and Student Perceptions of the Impacts of Communication in the Disciplines (CID) on Students' Development as Engineers

• Published in: IEEE transactions on professional communication Vol. 62; no. 1; pp. 27 - 42
• Main Authors: Paretti, Marie C., Eriksson, Andreas, Gustafsson, Magnus
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York IEEE 01.03.2019; The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
• Subjects: Case studies; Colleges & universities; Communication; Communication in the disciplines; Communication skills; Communication systems; Content modeling; disciplinary discourse; Engineering; Engineering education; Engineering students; integrating content and language; integrating content andlanguage; Learning; Literature reviews; Organizations; Students; Teachers; Writing
• ISSN: 0361-1434; 1558-1500; 1558-1500
• DOI: 10.1109/TPC.2019.2893393

Background: Research suggests that communication instruction is particularly effective when situated in disciplinary courses. While studies show that this approach improves communication skills, less is known about how it enhances engineering learning. Literature review: Prior work includes approaches to integrating communication into engineering, studies of writing to learn, and explorations of the role of communication in identity development. Research question: How might the integration of communication instruction and practice into undergraduate engineering courses support engineering learning? Methodology: Because little is known about how communication instruction enhances engineering learning, we conducted an exploratory case study of an established integrated program in one European university. Participants included six engineering instructors, five engineering program heads, and six engineering students. Using interviews and focus groups, we explored the engineering-specific gains that faculty and students perceived from integrating communication assignments into engineering courses. Results: Our analysis yielded three salient areas of learning: 1. understanding disciplinary content, 2. selecting important information, and 3. justifying choices. While the first aligns tightly with writing-to-learn research, all three themes, in fact, bridge content learning and disciplinary literacy to enhance students' development as engineering professionals. Conclusions: Communication instruction can potentially support engineering learning through assignments that prompt students to select information in ways that are consistent with both disciplinary values and the needs of stakeholders, and make and justify decisions about approaches and solutions in ways that demonstrate sound engineering judgment.