Do Party Governments Matter After All? Executive Ideology, Constitutional Structures and their Combined Effect on Welfare State Change

This paper presents a series of innovative, pooled time-series, cross-section (TSCS) regression models for 18 OECD countries (1971-2001) to explore the impact of executive ideology alternation and constitutional structures on welfare state change. Unlike other approaches in comparative welfare state...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of comparative policy analysis Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 395 - 415
Main Author Kuhner, Stefan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Abingdon Routledge 01.08.2010
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper presents a series of innovative, pooled time-series, cross-section (TSCS) regression models for 18 OECD countries (1971-2001) to explore the impact of executive ideology alternation and constitutional structures on welfare state change. Unlike other approaches in comparative welfare state research, the models specified in this paper focus not on the content or direction, but on the extent of change. Interaction effects between executive ideology alternation and constitutional structures are emphasized. The paper suggests that the effect of party ideology is particularly strong in political systems that concentrate power in the executive. In these systems, ideological differences from one cabinet to another lead to considerable policy change. Contrarily, systems with considerable degrees of consensus-based policy making are not only characterized by lower levels of welfare state change, but ideological differences of successive cabinets are more likely to lead to policy gridlock.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1387-6988
1572-5448
DOI:10.1080/13876988.2010.495507