Simulation-Based Shading Loss Analysis of a Shingled String for High-Density Photovoltaic Modules

Shingled photovoltaic (PV) modules with increased output have attracted growing interest compared to conventional PV modules. However, the area per unit solar cell of shingled PV modules is smaller because these modules are manufactured by dividing and bonding solar cells, which means that shingled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied sciences Vol. 11; no. 23; p. 11257
Main Authors Bae, Jaesung, Jee, Hongsub, Park, Yongseob, Lee, Jaehyeong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.12.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Shingled photovoltaic (PV) modules with increased output have attracted growing interest compared to conventional PV modules. However, the area per unit solar cell of shingled PV modules is smaller because these modules are manufactured by dividing and bonding solar cells, which means that shingled PV modules can easily have inferior shading characteristics. Therefore, analysis of the extent to which the shadow affects the output loss is essential, and the circuit needs to be designed accordingly. In this study, the loss resulting from the shading of the shingled string used to manufacture the shingled module was analyzed using simulation. A divided cell was modeled using a double-diode model, and a shingled string was formed by connecting the cell in series. The shading pattern was simulated according to the shading ratio of the vertical and horizontal patterns, and in the case of the shingled string, greater losses occurred in the vertical direction than the horizontal direction. In addition, it was modularized and compared with a conventional PV module and a shingled PV module. The results confirmed that the shingled PV module delivered higher shading output than the conventional PV module in less shade, and the result of the shading characteristic simulation of the shingled PV module was confirmed to be accurate within an error of 1%.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app112311257