Political Thought, International Relations theory and International Political Theory: an interpretation

• Published in: International relations (London) Vol. 31; no. 3; pp. 227 - 240
• Main Author: Brown, Chris
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.09.2017; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: 20th century; Communitarianism; Criticism; International relations; Justice; Philosophers; Political philosophy; Political science theories; Political theory; Rawls, John (1921-2002); political science; Cambridge School; John Rawls; history of political thought; social choice theory; English School; intellectual history; International Political Theory; International Relations theory
• ISSN: 0047-1178; 1741-2862
• DOI: 10.1177/0047117817723062

The relationship between political theory, including the history of political thought, and International Relations theory, including the history of international thought, has been, and to some extent remains, complex and troubled. On both sides of the Atlantic, the mid-twentieth century founders of International Relations as an academic discipline drew extensively on the canon of political thought, but approached the subject in an uncritical way, while political philosophers largely disdained the international as a focus. This changed in the 1970s and 1980s, with the emergence of the ‘justice industry’ based on critiques of Rawls’ A Theory of Justice and a consequent recovering of the past history of cosmopolitan and communitarian thought. A new discourse emerged in this period – International Political Theory – bridging the gap between political thought and international relations and stimulating a far more creative and scholarly approach to the history of international thought. However, in a social science environment dominated by the methods of economics, that is, formal theory and quantification, the new discourse of International Political Theory occupies a niche rather than existing at the centre of the discipline.