Comparison of six different methods for typing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from bottled and well waters

Twenty-three strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from bottled and well waters were biotyped, serotyped and examined by antimicrobial susceptibility, plasmid content, analysis of chromosomal DNA Eco RI ribopatterns (ribotyping) and by a PCR-based procedure. Phenotypic methods showed poor discr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWater research (Oxford) Vol. 31; no. 12; pp. 3169 - 3174
Main Authors Hernandez, Javier, Ferrus, Maria A., Hernandez, Manuel, Alonso, Jose L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.12.1997
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Twenty-three strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from bottled and well waters were biotyped, serotyped and examined by antimicrobial susceptibility, plasmid content, analysis of chromosomal DNA Eco RI ribopatterns (ribotyping) and by a PCR-based procedure. Phenotypic methods showed poor discrimination power between strains, and plasmids were detected in 29% of isolates. Southern blot hydridisation analysis showed genetic diversity between isolates, and six different ribotypes were defined. Arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR) analysis also differentiated between the strains with higher discriminatory power than ribotyping, since 13 different profiles were obtained. Both DNA-based methods are valuable alternatives to traditional typing systems for P. aeruginosa, and AP-PCR could be particularly useful for epidemiological studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0043-1354
1879-2448
DOI:10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00172-3