Natural gas facility methane emissions: measurements by tracer flux ratio in two US natural gas producing basins

• Published in: Elementa (Washington, D.C.) Vol. 5
• Main Authors: Yacovitch, Tara I., Daube, Conner, Vaughn, Timothy L., Bell, Clay S., Roscioli, Joseph R., Knighton, W. Berk, Nelson, David D., Zimmerle, Daniel, Pétron, Gabrielle, Herndon, Scott C.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oakland University of California Press, Journals & Digital Publishing Division 01.11.2017; BioOne
• Subjects: Basins; Datasets; distributions; dual tracer release; Emission; Emission measurements; Emissions; Gases; Hydrocarbons; Industrial plant emissions; Laboratories; Methane; Natural gas; Natural gas industry; Oil and Gas; Power plants; Ratios; Shale; Shale gas; tracer release; United States > US; Arkansas; Colorado
• ISSN: 2325-1026; 2325-1026
• DOI: 10.1525/elementa.251

Methane (CH4) emission rates from a sample of natural gas facilities across industry sectors were quantified using the dual tracer flux ratio methodology. Measurements were conducted in study areas within the Fayetteville shale play, Arkansas (FV, Sept–Oct 2015, 53 facilities), and the Denver-Julesburg basin, Colorado, (DJ, Nov 2014, 21 facilities). Distributions of methane emission rates at facilities by type are computed and statistically compared with results that cover broader geographic regions in the US (Allen et al., 2013, Mitchell et al., 2015). DJ gathering station emission rates (kg CH4 hr–1) are lower, while FV gathering and production sites are statistically indistinguishable as compared to these multi-basin results. However, FV gathering station throughput-normalized emissions are statistically lower than multi-basin results (0.19% vs. 0.44%). This implies that the FV gathering sector is emitting less per unit of gas throughput than would be expected from the multi-basin distribution alone. The most common emission rate (i.e. mode of the distribution) for facilities in this study is 40 kg CH4 hr–1 for FV gathering stations, 1.0 kg CH4 hr–1 for FV production pads, and 11 kg CH4 hr–1 for DJ gathering stations. The importance of study design is discussed, including the benefits of site access and data sharing with industry and of a scientist dedicated to measurement coordination and site choice under evolving wind conditions.