Type I and Type II errors in culturally sensitive conflict resolution practice

• Published in: Conflict resolution quarterly Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 351 - 371
• Main Author: Avruch, Kevin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.04.2003
• Subjects: Conflict Resolution; CULTURE; DISPUTE RESOLUTION; Dispute resolution (Law); Ethnic Relations; Ethnicity; Group dynamics; Intercultural dialogue; Interethnic conflict; Intergroup Relations; International conflicts; Interpersonal relations; Intervention; Intervention (Civil procedure); LEGAL PROFESSION; Multiculturalism; Peace process; Peace studies; Social psychology; UNITED STATES
• ISSN: 1536-5581; 1541-1508
• DOI: 10.1002/crq.29

Drawing on recent, critical work dealing with culture theory, ethnicity, and multiculturalism, this article seeks to address the nexus between conflict resolution theory and practice and aims primarily to contribute to the work of practitioners functioning as third parties and intervenors in intercultural and interethnic conflicts and disputes. Two conceptions of culture are proposed and analyzed: a technical, "experience-distant" sense of the term, crucial for conflict analysis (and for education and training); and an affectively laden, often politicized, "experience-near" sense of the term, at the root of so much intergroup conflict and thus implicated in effective and ethical intercultural practice.