Numerical resolution of the liquid–vapour two-phase flow by means of the two-fluid model and a pressure based method

► A two-fluid model six equations is used to solve the two-phase flow inside pipes. ► The numerical resolution is based on the MCBA algorithm using a pressure based method. ► Empirical correlations are applied depending on flow regime. ► A group of benchmark cases verifies the model. ► Good agreemen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of multiphase flow Vol. 43; pp. 118 - 130
Main Authors Morales-Ruiz, S., Rigola, J., Rodriguez, I., Oliva, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► A two-fluid model six equations is used to solve the two-phase flow inside pipes. ► The numerical resolution is based on the MCBA algorithm using a pressure based method. ► Empirical correlations are applied depending on flow regime. ► A group of benchmark cases verifies the model. ► Good agreement between numerical results and analytical or experimental data validates the model. A numerical study based on a two-fluid model to describe the fluid-dynamic behaviour of the two-phase flow inside ducts is presented. The discretization of the governing equations has been developed by means of the finite volume technique using a staggered mesh. A semi-implicit pressure-based method is used to couple the fluid conservation equations. Different empirical correlations have been used to evaluate the mass, momentum and energy exchanged through the interface, gas and liquid distribution in the tube, and other terms which appear in the conservation equations. These correlations are used depending on the flow regime map, which is function of the gas volume fraction and velocities. The instability of the two-fluid model due to the equations system is non-hyperbolic has been analyzed. Different two-phase flow cases have been solved by means of the method proposed in this paper. After a verification process to assess the quality of the numerical results obtained, the results are compared, when possible, with analytical solutions, and also with experimental data obtained by the authors.
ISSN:0301-9322
1879-3533
DOI:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2012.03.004