The Cost-Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Second-Generation Antidepressants for Initial Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in the United States: A Decision Analytic Model

Most guidelines for major depressive disorder recommend initial treatment with either a second-generation antidepressant (SGA) or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Although most trials suggest that these treatments have similar efficacy, their health economic implications are uncertain. To quantif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of internal medicine Vol. 171; no. 11; p. 785
Main Authors Ross, Eric L, Vijan, Sandeep, Miller, Erin M, Valenstein, Marcia, Zivin, Kara
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 03.12.2019
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Most guidelines for major depressive disorder recommend initial treatment with either a second-generation antidepressant (SGA) or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Although most trials suggest that these treatments have similar efficacy, their health economic implications are uncertain. To quantify the cost-effectiveness of CBT versus SGA for initial treatment of depression. Decision analytic model. Relative effectiveness data from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials; additional clinical and economic data from other publications. Adults with newly diagnosed major depressive disorder in the United States. 1 to 5 years. Health care sector and societal. Initial treatment with either an SGA or group and individual CBT. Costs in 2014 U.S. dollars, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. In model projections, CBT produced higher QALYs (3 days more at 1 year and 20 days more at 5 years) with higher costs at 1 year (health care sector, $900; societal, $1500) but lower costs at 5 years (health care sector, -$1800; societal, -$2500). In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, SGA had a 64% to 77% likelihood of having an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $100 000 or less per QALY at 1 year; CBT had a 73% to 77% likelihood at 5 years. Uncertainty in the relative risk for relapse of depression contributed the most to overall uncertainty in the optimal treatment. Long-term trials comparing CBT and SGA are lacking. Neither SGAs nor CBT provides consistently superior cost-effectiveness relative to the other. Given many patients' preference for psychotherapy over pharmacotherapy, increasing patient access to CBT may be warranted. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institute of Mental Health.
ISSN:1539-3704
DOI:10.7326/M18-1480