Endoscopic butterfly inlay myringoplasty: new technique extended perichondrium butterfly

Background: Various graft materials and surgical methods are used in the treatment of tympanic membrane perforations. Aims/Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the operation method and graft success of extended perichondrial butterfly myringoplasty performed by an endoscopic method and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa oto-laryngologica Vol. 140; no. 4; pp. 277 - 280
Main Authors Özdemir, Doğukan, Özgür, Abdulkadir, Mehel, Dursun Mehmet, Bedir, Ahmet, Çelebi, Mehmet, Aydemir, Samet, Turgut, Nesrettin Fatih
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 02.04.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Various graft materials and surgical methods are used in the treatment of tympanic membrane perforations. Aims/Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the operation method and graft success of extended perichondrial butterfly myringoplasty performed by an endoscopic method and the hearing gain of patients. Material and Method: This was a retrospective study evaluating the hearing tests of 54 ears of 48 patients (28 male, 20 female) who underwent surgery between February 2017 and March 2019. Pure-tone audiometric results were analyzed preoperatively and six months postoperatively by recording the perforation size, the duration of surgery, and graft success. Results: The graft success rate was 98.1% (53/54 ears). The perforations were most frequently located in the anterior quadrant and were small-sized. The mean preoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was 17.4 ± 5.24 dB. The mean ABG was 9.2 ± 2.13 dB 1 month postoperatively and 8.5 ± 2.26 dB 6 months postoperatively (p < .005). Conclusions: The endoscopic inlay extended perichondrial butterfly myringoplasty method is safe and doesn't require tympanomeatal flap elevation. Moreover, it shortens hospitalization time, facilitates anatomical closure of the membrane, and sometimes closes perforations in the anterior part, which cannot be clearly evaluated after graft placement.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-6489
1651-2251
DOI:10.1080/00016489.2020.1730949