Digital Delivery of a Global Critical Care Education Program

• Published in: ATS scholar Vol. 4; no. 2; pp. 198 - 206
• Main Authors: Sun, Yuqiang, Kashyap, Rahul, Heise, Katherine, Castillo Zambrano, Claudia, Niven, Alexander, Gajic, Ognjen, Dong, Yue
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Thoracic Society 01.06.2023
• Subjects: Innovations; global health survey; critical care; interprofessional education; checklist; quality improvement
• ISSN: 2690-7097; 2690-7097
• DOI: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2022-0086IN

CERTAIN (Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness and iNjury) education program was developed to accelerate the global dissemination of a standardized, systemic, structured approach to critical care delivery. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic prompted the evolution of this program from a live in-person course to a blended synchronous and asynchronous learning experience, including virtual simulation. We describe our experience and insights gained through this digital program transformation and highlight areas in need of further research to advance the delivery of high-quality online education offerings to global interprofessional audiences. The CERTAIN education program was delivered to a broad international audience first in person (2016-2019) and then virtually during the COVID-19 global pandemic (2020-present). During this transition, we adopted a flipped classroom model to deliver the core content asynchronously using an online learning management system, supplemented by a novel synchronous online experience to provide learners with the opportunity to apply these concepts using a series of simulated clinical cases. A total of 400 participants attended 11 CERTAIN courses. We transitioned our 10-hour live course to a 3-hour virtual workshop. The duration of simulation activities (admission, rounding, and shared decision-making) remained constant. Didactic lectures were eliminated from the synchronous online course and presented as recorded videos in precourse materials. We collected 306 postcourse surveys (response rate, 76.5%). The majority of the overall course ratings were excellent (147 [49.5%]) and very good (97 [32.7%]), and learner responses were similar to live and online courses. Simulation activities were consistently the most popular elements of our program. Access to digital learning platforms and language barriers during simulation activities proved to be the greatest challenges during our transition. Delivering mobile-friendly online content and close coordination between dedicated bilingual faculty and local champions helped overcome these challenges. Critical care education and case-based simulation workshops can be delivered to international interprofessional audiences with similar, high degrees of learner satisfaction to in-person offerings.