Incidence of maternal tachycardia during the second stage of labor: a prospective observational cohort study

To our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study reporting on maternal heart rate (MHR) levels in laboring women (30 patients), and maternal tachycardia that is a potential risk factor in fetal monitoring confusion. Our objective was to analyze a large population of contiguous laboring patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine Vol. 32; no. 10; p. 1615
Main Authors Towers, Craig V, Trussell, John, Heidel, Robert E, Chernicky, Lindsey, Howard, Bobby C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 19.05.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study reporting on maternal heart rate (MHR) levels in laboring women (30 patients), and maternal tachycardia that is a potential risk factor in fetal monitoring confusion. Our objective was to analyze a large population of contiguous laboring patients and to assess the MHR levels attained during the second stage. We performed a prospective study that analyzed MHR levels of second-stage laboring patients evaluating numerous predisposing maternal conditions. Univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed. A total of 1105 contiguous patients were analyzed and 33.9% had a sustained MHR ≥100; 18.8% had an MHR ≥110; and 9.1% had an MHR ≥120. Multivariate analysis of all potential predisposing maternal conditions did not reveal any specific variable as uniformly significant for predicting maternal tachycardia across all levels of analysis. The incidence of maternal tachycardia in the second stage of labor is common. We recommend that if the MHR is ≥100 during labor, the simultaneous maternal and fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring will be used to minimize the potential for fetal monitoring confusion and risking poor fetal outcome if the fetus is in distress.
ISSN:1476-4954
DOI:10.1080/14767058.2017.1411476