Integrated management of atrial fibrillation in primary care: results of the ALL-IN cluster randomized trial

Abstract Aims To evaluate whether integrated care for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be safely orchestrated in primary care. Methods and results The ALL-IN trial was a cluster randomized, open-label, pragmatic non-inferiority trial performed in primary care practices in the Netherlands. We randomized...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean heart journal Vol. 41; no. 30; pp. 2836 - 2844
Main Authors van den Dries, Carline J, van Doorn, Sander, Rutten, Frans H, Oudega, Ruud, van de Leur, Sjef J C M, Elvan, Arif, Oude Grave, Lisa, Bilo, Henk J G, Moons, Karel G M, Hoes, Arno W, Geersing, Geert-Jan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 07.08.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Aims To evaluate whether integrated care for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be safely orchestrated in primary care. Methods and results The ALL-IN trial was a cluster randomized, open-label, pragmatic non-inferiority trial performed in primary care practices in the Netherlands. We randomized 26 practices: 15 to the integrated care intervention and 11 to usual care. The integrated care intervention consisted of (i) quarterly AF check-ups by trained nurses in primary care, also focusing on possibly interfering comorbidities, (ii) monitoring of anticoagulation therapy in primary care, and finally (iii) easy-access availability of consultations from cardiologists and anticoagulation clinics. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during 2 years of follow-up. In the intervention arm, 527 out of 941 eligible AF patients aged ≥65 years provided informed consent to undergo the intervention. These 527 patients were compared with 713 AF patients in the control arm receiving usual care. Median age was 77 (interquartile range 72–83) years. The all-cause mortality rate was 3.5 per 100 patient-years in the intervention arm vs. 6.7 per 100 patient-years in the control arm [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37–0.82]. For non-cardiovascular mortality, the adjusted HR was 0.47 (95% CI 0.27–0.82). For other adverse events, no statistically significant differences were observed. Conclusion In this cluster randomized trial, integrated care for elderly AF patients in primary care showed a 45% reduction in all-cause mortality when compared with usual care.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa055