EUS-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a comprehensive meta-analysis

• Published in: Minimally invasive therapy and allied technologies Vol. ahead-of-print; no. ahead-of-print; pp. 1 - 15
• Main Authors: Li, Jia-Su, Lin, Kun, Tang, Jian, Liu, Feng, Fang, Jun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 01.12.2023
• Subjects: adverse events; Endosonography - methods; enteral stenting; EUS-guided gastroenterostomy; gastric outlet obstruction; Gastric Outlet Obstruction - etiology; Gastric Outlet Obstruction - surgery; Gastroenterostomy - adverse effects; Gastroenterostomy - methods; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Stents; surgical gastroenterostomy; surgical gastroenterostomy; adverse events; enteral stenting; EUS-guided gastroenterostomy; gastric outlet obstruction
• ISSN: 1364-5706; 1365-2931; 1365-2931
• DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2023.2221336

A comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) for benign and malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes evaluated technical success, clinical success, and adverse events (AEs). Twenty-six studies with 1493 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and overall AEs of EUS-GE were 94.0%, 89.9%, and 13.1%, respectively. Eight studies were included in the subgroup meta-analysis for comparative evaluation of EUS-GE and surgical gastroenterostomy (SGE), while seven studies were for EUS-GE and enteral stenting (ES). Compared with SGE, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) of technical success, clinical success, and overall AEs of EUS-GE were 0.17 (p = .003), 1.42 (p = .40), and 0.15 (p < .00001), respectively. When compared with ES, the above corresponding pooled ORs were 0.55 (p = .11), 2.64 (p < .0001), and 0.41 (p = .01), respectively. Although it is technically challenging, this largest meta-analysis indicates that EUS-GE has comparable and high technical and clinical success rates and hence a very effective minimally invasive procedure for GOO.