Diagnostic evaluation of optical coherence tomography parameters in normal, preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma patients

AIM: To compare the diagnostic ability of glaucoma parameters measured by the optical coherence tomography (OCT) in normal, preperimetric glaucoma (PPG) and perimetric glaucoma (PG) patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study includes 127 eyes of 127 subjects. Patients were divided i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of ophthalmology Vol. 15; no. 11; pp. 1782 - 1790
Main Authors Yusof, Aimy Mastura Zurairah, Tang, Seng Fai, Hassan, Mohd Rohaizat, Din, Norshamsiah Md
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published International Journal of Ophthalmology Press 18.11.2022
Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM: To compare the diagnostic ability of glaucoma parameters measured by the optical coherence tomography (OCT) in normal, preperimetric glaucoma (PPG) and perimetric glaucoma (PG) patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study includes 127 eyes of 127 subjects. Patients were divided into PPG (51 eyes), PG (46 eyes), and normal controls (30 eyes) based on clinical optic disc assessment and Humphrey visual field changes. The Heidelberg Spectralis OCT machine using Glaucoma Module Premium Edition software was used to measure the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and Bruch’s membrane opening-minimum rim width (BMO-MRW) to assess the optic nerve head and ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness in the macula. RESULTS: RNFL, MRW, and GCL thickness were all significantly thinner in PG compared to PPG and the normal group. The BMO-MRW parameters showed better specificity (>70%) at 90% specificity compared to both RNFL and GCL parameters to discriminate normal, PPG, and PG patients. All BMO-MRW parameters showed higher area under curves (AUC) compared to RNFL and GCL parameters with the highest AUC observed in the superotemporal sector of the BMO-MRW (AUC=0.819 and and 0.897 between normal and PPG and PG groups respectively). CONCLUSION: While the BMO-MRW best discriminates PPG and PG against normal eyes, GCL parameters poorly differentiate the three groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2222-3959
2227-4898
DOI:10.18240/ijo.2022.11.08