Isomerization of the constituents of ion/neutral complexes during the fragmentation of protonated dialkyl-substituted 1,3-diphenylpropanes

[Display omitted] ▶ Isomerization of the neutral constituent of ion/neutral complexes ▶ Isomerization of the ionic constituent of ion/neutral complexes ▶ H +-induced 1,2- t-C 4H 9 shift affects the intra-complex reactivity of the neutral ▶ Cyclohexyl vs. methylcyclopentyl cations as constituents of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of mass spectrometry Vol. 306; no. 2; pp. 167 - 174
Main Authors Kuck, Dietmar, Matthias, Carsten, Barth, Dieter, Letzel, Matthias C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 15.09.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] ▶ Isomerization of the neutral constituent of ion/neutral complexes ▶ Isomerization of the ionic constituent of ion/neutral complexes ▶ H +-induced 1,2- t-C 4H 9 shift affects the intra-complex reactivity of the neutral ▶ Cyclohexyl vs. methylcyclopentyl cations as constituents of I/N complexes ▶ Designed synthesis enables the generation of “tailored” I/N complexes The fragmentation of gaseous ion/neutral complexes [R +⋯C 6H 5CH 2CH 2CH 2C 6H 4–R′] with (i) R = R′ = C 4H 9, (ii) R = C 4H 9 and R′ = CH 3 and (iii) R = C 6H 11 and R′ = H has been studied by CI(CH 4)-MIKE spectrometry of the corresponding alkyl-substituted 1,3-diphenylpropanes. Different from all other isomers containing two para-alkyl substituents, the [M+H] + ion generated from the symmetrical ion [(4- tert-C 4H 9-C 6H 4)CH 2CH 2CH 2(C 6H 4-4- tert-C 4H 9) + H] + shows the characteristic fragmentation pattern of ion–neutral complexes containing a meta-alkyl-substituted 1,3-diphenylpropane. This indicates a proton-induced 1,2-shift of one or even both of the tert-C 4H 9 groups and requires the presence of the meta-( tert-C 4H 9)-substituted diphenylpropane as the neutral constituent of the eventually fragmenting I/N complex. As a consequence, it appears that the reactive complex [C 4H 9 +⋯C 6H 5CH 2CH 2CH 2(C 6H 4-3- tert-C 4H 9)] is formed prior to the generation of the expected “ para-isomer”, [C 4H 9 +⋯C 6H 5CH 2CH 2CH 2(C 6H 4-4- tert-C 4H 9)]. Isobutyl analogues, such as [(4- iso-C 4H 9-C 6H 4)CH 2CH 2CH 2(C 6H 4-4- iso-C 4H 9) + H] +, do not show evidence for the intermediacy of “isomerized” I/N complexes containing a tert-C 4H 9 + ion. The fragmentation of ion–neutral complexes containing C 6H 11 + ions, formed from the [M+H] + ions of (4-cyclohexyl)- and of 4-(1-methylcyclopentyl)-substituted 1,3-diphenylpropane, indicate that the C 6H 11 + ions only partially retain their structural identity: while the secondary isomer, (CH 2) 5 > CH +, predominantly transfers a proton in competition to hydride abstraction, indicating its stronger Bronsted acidity, the tertiary isomer, (CH 2) 4 > C +CH 3, mainly reacts by hydride abstraction. In spite of the partial isomerization, deuterium labelling experiments corroborate the usual regioselectivity of the hydride abstraction from the benzylic methylene groups in both cases.
ISSN:1387-3806
1873-2798
DOI:10.1016/j.ijms.2010.10.007