Neonatal intensive care unit admissions before and after the adoption of the baby friendly hospital initiative

• Published in: The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine Vol. 35; no. 4; p. 657
• Main Authors: Fradkin, Eliza C, Lafferty, Margaret A, Greenspan, Jay S, Aghai, Zubair H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 16.02.2022
• Subjects: Breast Feeding; Female; Hospitalization; Hospitals, Urban; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; Retrospective Studies; neonate; infant; Baby friendly hospital initiative; duration of stay; hypoglycemia
• ISSN: 1476-4954
• DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1730796

The Baby Friendly Hospital initiative (BFHI) is a global initiative of the World Health Organization developed in 1991 to promote and support successful breastfeeding. It has led to increased rates of exclusive breastfeeding. Exclusive breastfeeding may increase risk for hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and dehydration requiring higher level of neonatal care. To determine if there was a change in admissions to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) from the newborn nursery after the adoption of BFHI in a large urban hospital. This is a retrospective analysis of all neonates admitted to the NICU from the newborn nursery between January 2007 and December 2016 at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, in Philadelphia, PA, USA. Demographics, clinical characteristics and primary diagnosis for admission were compared between those admitted before (January 2007 to December 2011) and after (January 2012 to December 2016) the initiation of BFHI. A total of 20,124 infants were born and 3,684 infants (18.3%) were admitted to NICU. 570 infants (2.8% of live birth) were admitted to the NICU from the newborn nursery, 282 (49.5%) were born before and 288 (50.5%) born after BFHI. There was no significant difference in the number of infants admitted from the newborn nursery either as a percentage of total deliveries (2.8 versus 2.9%,  = .6) or percentage of total NICU admissions (15.5 versus 15.5%,  = 1.0) before and after the BFHI. Additionally, there was no difference in number of infants admitted with a diagnosis of possible sepsis, hypoglycemia, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) and hyperbilirubinemia between the two groups. However, significantly more infants admitted with hypoglycemia required IV fluids for hypoglycemia after the initiation of BFHI (8 out of 27 versus 21 out of 28, .001). The age of admission was higher and the duration of NICU stay was shorter in infants admitted after the initiation of the BFHI. The BFHI has not led to a significant change in the number of infants admitted to NICU from the newborn nursery or reasons for their admissions. However, since its adoption, there has been an increase in the use of IV fluids for treatment of hypoglycemia. These findings suggest a role for additional treatments other than formula to prevent IV fluid use, such as glucose gel. Change in NICU guidelines for the management of possible sepsis and NAS may have impacted the duration of hospitalization in infants born after BFHI.