Levantine Perspectives on the Middle to Upper Paleolithic “Transition”

• Published in: Archaeology, ethnology & anthropology of Eurasia Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. 12 - 21
• Main Author: Meignen, L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.09.2012
• Subjects: Initial Upper Paleolithic; Late Middle Paleolithic; Levant; processes of change; “transition,” lithic technology; Late Middle Paleolithic; Levant; processes of change; “transition,” lithic technology; Initial Upper Paleolithic
• ISSN: 1563-0110; 1531-832X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aeae.2012.11.003

This article presents a synthesis of the presently available data concerning the processes and meaning of the technical changes in lithic productions across the Middle Paleolithic/Upper Paleolithic boundary in the Levant. As a “corridor” between Africa and Eurasia, this area is of first importance in the discussion of Modern Human origins. The results of several new field projects (especially concerning the Initial Upper Paleolithic), the recent lithic technological studies (based on the chaîne opératoire concept) as well as radiometric dating were used here to discuss the rhythms and processes of technical changes at the onset of the Upper Paleolithic, examining carefully the lithic repertoire from the Late Middle Paleolithic through the Initial Upper Paleolithic from Lebanon, Syria, Turkey, and Israel. This paper puts forward the idea that the emergence of Upper Paleolithic technical characteristics did not occur following a single process, even in the same region (here the Levant), but most probably followed a “mosaic” pattern. However taking into account the data presently available, the main basic scenario for the onset of the Upper Paleolithic in this region would have been the generalization of new technical traits that would have emerged within certain local Late Middle Paleolithic and the following Initial Upper Paleolithic groups. If a diffusion phenomenon should be considered, as claimed by many scholars, the available information suggests that it has functioned more as a stimulus rather than the simplistic scenario of a catastrophic wave of population and the resulting acculturation.