Evaluation of Choroidal Thickness in Patients with Proliferative and Non-Proliferative Macular Telangiectasia Using Enhanced Depth Imaging Optical Coherence Tomography

• Published in: Current eye research Vol. 45; no. 4; pp. 504 - 508
• Main Authors: Demir, Gokhan, Cakir, Ihsan, Alkin, Zeynep, Demircan, Ali, Tulu, Beril, Fazıl, Korhan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 02.04.2020
• Subjects: Choroid - pathology; Choroidal thickness; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Macula Lutea - pathology; macular telangiectasia; Male; Middle Aged; Retinal Telangiectasis - diagnosis; Retrospective Studies; subretinal neovascularization; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods; Visual Acuity; macular telangiectasia; Choroidal thickness; subretinal neovascularization
• ISSN: 0271-3683; 1460-2202; 1460-2202
• DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1673437

Purpose: To compare subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in eyes with non-proliferative macular telangiectasia (MacTel) type 2 with or without subretinal neovascularization (SRNV) and healthy control eyes. Methods: Consecutive patients with non-proliferative and proliferative MacTel type 2 were included in the current study. For comparisons subjects with no ocular pathology were recruited and used as controls. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) were evaluated. Since axial length (AL) may affect choroidal thickness, AL measurements were performed to avoid confusion in SFCT between the groups. Results: Of the 63 eyes of 38 MacTel type 2 patients, 38 eyes had only MacTel type 2 (group 1) and 25 eyes had SRNV caused by MacTel type 2 (group 2). Fourty eyes of 20 subjects served as controls (group 3). BCVA was found to be significantly higher in control group compared with group 1 and group 2 (p < .005). Whereas, no difference was detected between group 1 and group 2 (p = .75). No difference was noted in CMT between the groups (p = .35). Axial length measurement was very similar among all three groups (p = .62). After adjusting for age and axial length SFCT was significantly thinner in group 3 than the other groups (p < .001), but no statistically significant difference was found between group 1 and group 2. Conclusions: Choroidal thickness did not vary between eyes with MacTel type 2 with SRNV and without SRNV. Choroid was significantly thicker in MacTel type 2 with SRNV and without SRNV than healthy eyes.