An auto-ethnographic study of co-produced health research in a patient organisation: unpacking the good, the bad, and the unspoken

In rare diseases, limited access to services and rare disease experts may force families to act as medical advocates for their child; they can volunteer to support clinician-initiated research or initiate and lead research themselves. Ketotic Hypoglycemia International (KHI) is a new, global organiz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResearch involvement and engagement Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 76 - 15
Main Authors Janssens, Astrid, Drachmann, Danielle, Barnes-Cullen, Kristy, Carrigg, Austin, Christesen, Henrik Thybo, Futers, Becky, Lavery, Yvette Ollada, Palms, Tiffany, Petersen, Jacob Sten, Shah, Pratik, Thornton, Paul, Wolfsdorf, Joseph
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 23.07.2024
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In rare diseases, limited access to services and rare disease experts may force families to act as medical advocates for their child; they can volunteer to support clinician-initiated research or initiate and lead research themselves. Ketotic Hypoglycemia International (KHI) is a new, global organization for families affected by idiopathic ketotic hypoglycemia (IKH) and is run solely by volunteers. Doing research together, families and international experts in a collaborative process such as at KHI, also referred to as patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) or extreme citizen science, is often praised for its positive effects on the research and the stakeholders involved. We used auto-ethnographic narratives from parents and medical professionals in KHI to report on their experiences with co-produced health research. All co-authors wrote down their experiences in relation to three topics: time invested, work invested and power dynamics. Whilst the parents and health care professionals felt a new hope for (their) children with IKH, they also felt pressure to contribute time or to be flexible in how and when they dedicated time towards the organization. The power dynamics were characterised by a change in the relationship between the parents and medical experts; the parent being taught by the expert shifted to the expert learning from the lived experience of the parent. Both parents and medical experts struggled with maintaining boundaries and safeguarding their mental health. Our findings call for the need to secure and prioritize funding for patient organizations, to enable them to create the sustainable architecture required for meaningful PPIE within these organizations. The morals and often deeply personal reasons for engaging with voluntary work in health research, can lead to overstepping of boundaries. As a result of our research, we call for the development of ethics of care guidelines within collaborative health research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2056-7529
2056-7529
DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00609-8