P-value, compatibility, and S-value

Misinterpretations of P-values and 95% confidence intervals are ubiquitous in medical research. Specifically, the terms significance or confidence, extensively used in medical papers, ignore biases and violations of statistical assumptions and hence should be called overconfidence terms. In this pap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal Epidemiology Vol. 4; p. 100085
Main Authors Mansournia, Mohammad Ali, Nazemipour, Maryam, Etminan, Mahyar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.12.2022
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Misinterpretations of P-values and 95% confidence intervals are ubiquitous in medical research. Specifically, the terms significance or confidence, extensively used in medical papers, ignore biases and violations of statistical assumptions and hence should be called overconfidence terms. In this paper, we present the compatibility view of P-values and confidence intervals; the P-value is interpreted as an index of compatibility between data and the model, including the test hypothesis and background assumptions, whereas a confidence interval is interpreted as the range of parameter values that are compatible with the data under background assumptions. We also suggest the use of a surprisal measure, often referred to as the S-value, a novel metric that transforms the P-value, for gauging compatibility in terms of an intuitive experiment of coin tossing.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2590-1133
2590-1133
DOI:10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100085