Parents’ decision-making regarding whether to receive adult-onset only genetic findings for their children: Findings from the BabySeq Project
Most professional guidelines recommend against genetic screening for adult-onset only (AO) conditions until adulthood, yet others argue that there may be benefit to disclosing such results. We explored parents’ decision-making on this issue in the BabySeq Project, a clinical trial of newborn genomic...
Saved in:
Published in | Genetics in medicine Vol. 25; no. 3; p. 100002 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.03.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Most professional guidelines recommend against genetic screening for adult-onset only (AO) conditions until adulthood, yet others argue that there may be benefit to disclosing such results. We explored parents’ decision-making on this issue in the BabySeq Project, a clinical trial of newborn genomic sequencing.
We conducted interviews with parents (N = 24) who were given the option to receive actionable AO results for their children. Interviews explored parents’ motivations to receive and reasons to decline AO genetic disease risk information, their decision-making process, and their suggestions for supporting parents in making this decision.
Parents noted several motivations to receive and reasons to decline AO results. Most commonly, parents cited early intervention/surveillance (n = 11), implications for family health (n = 7), and the ability to prepare (n = 6) as motivations to receive these results. The most common reasons to decline were protection of the child’s future autonomy (n = 4), negative effect on parenting (n = 3), and anxiety about future disease (n = 3). Parents identified a number of ways to support parents in making this decision.
Results show considerations to better support parental decision-making that aligns with their values when offering AO genetic information because it is more commonly integrated into pediatric clinical care. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Funding acquisition: AHB, IAH, RCG, ALM These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship Conceptualization: SP, KDC, CAG, CLBZ, BZ, ALM, IAH, RCG, ALM Pankaj B Agrawal, Alan H. Beggs, Wendi N. Betting, Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy, Kurt D. Christensen, Dmitry Dukhovny, Shawn Fayer, Leslie A. Frankel, Casie A. Genetti, Chet Graham, Robert C. Green, Amanda M. Gutierrez, Maegan Harden, Ingrid A Holm, Joel B. Krier, Matthew S. Lebo, Kaitlyn B. Lee, Harvey L. Levy, Xingquan Lu, Kalotina Machini, Amy L. McGuire, Jaclyn B. Murry, Medha Naik, Tiffany T. Nguyen Dolphyn, Richard B. Parad, Hayley A. Peoples, Stacey Pereira, Devan Petersen, Uma Ramamurthy, Vivek Ramanathan, Heidi L. Rehm, Amy Roberts, Jill Oliver Robinson, Sergei Roumiantsev, Talia S. Schwartz, Hadley Stevens Smith, Tina K Truong, Grace E. VanNoy, Susan E. Waisbren, Timothy W. Yu, Carrie L Blout Zawatsky, Bethany Zettler Writing-original draft: SP, AMG, JOR, ALM Methodology: SP, AMG, JOR, MKU, ALM Formal analysis: SP, AMG, JOR, ALM Supervision: SP, AHB, IAH, RCG, ALM Babyseq Project Team Members Project administration: SP, JOR, RLH, CAG, CLBZ, BZ Data curation: SP, AMG, JOR, RLH Author Contributions Writing-review & editing: SP, AMG, JOR, KDC, CAG, CLBZ, RLH, BZ, MKU, RBP, AHB, IAH, RCG, ALM |
ISSN: | 1098-3600 1530-0366 1530-0366 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gim.2022.100002 |