Parents’ decision-making regarding whether to receive adult-onset only genetic findings for their children: Findings from the BabySeq Project

Most professional guidelines recommend against genetic screening for adult-onset only (AO) conditions until adulthood, yet others argue that there may be benefit to disclosing such results. We explored parents’ decision-making on this issue in the BabySeq Project, a clinical trial of newborn genomic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGenetics in medicine Vol. 25; no. 3; p. 100002
Main Authors Pereira, Stacey, Gutierrez, Amanda M., Robinson, Jill Oliver, Christensen, Kurt D., Genetti, Casie A., Blout Zawatsky, Carrie L., Hsu, Rebecca L., Zettler, Bethany, Uveges, Melissa Kurtz, Parad, Richard B., Beggs, Alan H., Holm, Ingrid A., Green, Robert C., McGuire, Amy L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Most professional guidelines recommend against genetic screening for adult-onset only (AO) conditions until adulthood, yet others argue that there may be benefit to disclosing such results. We explored parents’ decision-making on this issue in the BabySeq Project, a clinical trial of newborn genomic sequencing. We conducted interviews with parents (N = 24) who were given the option to receive actionable AO results for their children. Interviews explored parents’ motivations to receive and reasons to decline AO genetic disease risk information, their decision-making process, and their suggestions for supporting parents in making this decision. Parents noted several motivations to receive and reasons to decline AO results. Most commonly, parents cited early intervention/surveillance (n = 11), implications for family health (n = 7), and the ability to prepare (n = 6) as motivations to receive these results. The most common reasons to decline were protection of the child’s future autonomy (n = 4), negative effect on parenting (n = 3), and anxiety about future disease (n = 3). Parents identified a number of ways to support parents in making this decision. Results show considerations to better support parental decision-making that aligns with their values when offering AO genetic information because it is more commonly integrated into pediatric clinical care.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Funding acquisition: AHB, IAH, RCG, ALM
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship
Conceptualization: SP, KDC, CAG, CLBZ, BZ, ALM, IAH, RCG, ALM
Pankaj B Agrawal, Alan H. Beggs, Wendi N. Betting, Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy, Kurt D. Christensen, Dmitry Dukhovny, Shawn Fayer, Leslie A. Frankel, Casie A. Genetti, Chet Graham, Robert C. Green, Amanda M. Gutierrez, Maegan Harden, Ingrid A Holm, Joel B. Krier, Matthew S. Lebo, Kaitlyn B. Lee, Harvey L. Levy, Xingquan Lu, Kalotina Machini, Amy L. McGuire, Jaclyn B. Murry, Medha Naik, Tiffany T. Nguyen Dolphyn, Richard B. Parad, Hayley A. Peoples, Stacey Pereira, Devan Petersen, Uma Ramamurthy, Vivek Ramanathan, Heidi L. Rehm, Amy Roberts, Jill Oliver Robinson, Sergei Roumiantsev, Talia S. Schwartz, Hadley Stevens Smith, Tina K Truong, Grace E. VanNoy, Susan E. Waisbren, Timothy W. Yu, Carrie L Blout Zawatsky, Bethany Zettler
Writing-original draft: SP, AMG, JOR, ALM
Methodology: SP, AMG, JOR, MKU, ALM
Formal analysis: SP, AMG, JOR, ALM
Supervision: SP, AHB, IAH, RCG, ALM
Babyseq Project Team Members
Project administration: SP, JOR, RLH, CAG, CLBZ, BZ
Data curation: SP, AMG, JOR, RLH
Author Contributions
Writing-review & editing: SP, AMG, JOR, KDC, CAG, CLBZ, RLH, BZ, MKU, RBP, AHB, IAH, RCG, ALM
ISSN:1098-3600
1530-0366
1530-0366
DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2022.100002