A practical guide to handling competing events in etiologic time-to-event studies

Competing events are events that preclude the occurrence of the primary outcome. Much has been written on mainly the statistics behind competing events analyses. However, many of these publications and tutorials have a strong statistical tone and might fall short in providing a practical guide to cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal Epidemiology Vol. 4; p. 100080
Main Authors Mansournia, Mohammad Ali, Nazemipour, Maryam, Etminan, Mahyar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 01.12.2022
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Competing events are events that preclude the occurrence of the primary outcome. Much has been written on mainly the statistics behind competing events analyses. However, many of these publications and tutorials have a strong statistical tone and might fall short in providing a practical guide to clinician researchers as to when to use a competing event analysis and more importantly which method to use and why. Here we discuss the different target effects in the Fine-Gray and cause-specific methods using simple causal diagrams and provide strengths and limitations of both approaches for addressing etiologic questions. We argue why the Fine-Gray method might not be the best approach for handling competing events in etiological time-to-event studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2590-1133
2590-1133
DOI:10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100080