Solving the maximum edge disjoint path problem using a modified Lagrangian particle swarm optimisation hybrid
•Lagrangian Relaxation can be used effectively to solve the Maximum Edge Disjoint Path problem.•Hybridising Lagrangian Relaxation with Particle Swarm Optimisation has significantly improved performance.•The new method generates both high quality primal and dual solutions.•A new synthetic dataset has...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of operational research Vol. 293; no. 3; pp. 847 - 862 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
16.09.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •Lagrangian Relaxation can be used effectively to solve the Maximum Edge Disjoint Path problem.•Hybridising Lagrangian Relaxation with Particle Swarm Optimisation has significantly improved performance.•The new method generates both high quality primal and dual solutions.•A new synthetic dataset has been created for future researchers.
This paper presents a new method to solve the Maximum Edge Disjoint Paths (MEDP) problem. Given a set of node pairs within a network, the MEDP problem is the task of finding the largest number of pairs that can be connected by paths, using each edge within the network at most once. We present a heuristic algorithm that builds a hybridisation of Lagrangian Relaxation and Particle Swarm Optimisation, referred to as LaPSO. This hybridisation is combined with a new repair heuristic, called Largest Violation Perturbation (LVP). We show that our LaPSO method produces better heuristic solutions than both current state-of-the-art heuristic methods, as well as the primal solution found by a standard Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) solver within a limited runtime. Significantly, when run with a limited runtime, our LaPSO method also produces strong bounds which are superior to a standard MIP solver for the larger instances tested, whilst being competitive for the remainder. This allows our LaPSO method to prove optimality for many instances and provide optimality gaps for the remainder, making it a “quasi-exact” method. In this way our LaPSO algorithm, which draws on ideas from both mathematical programming and evolutionary algorithms, is able to outperform both MIP and metaheuristic solvers that only use ideas from one of these areas. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0377-2217 1872-6860 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.01.009 |