Formal insurance and informal risk sharing dynamics

• Published in: Journal of economic behavior & organization Vol. 180; pp. 837 - 863
• Main Authors: Lin, Wanchuan, Meng, Juanjuan, Weng, Xi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.12.2020
• Subjects: Crowding-out; Guilt; Insurance; Risk sharing; Social preferences; O17; Insurance; Risk sharing; C91; Guilt; D81; Crowding-out; Social preferences
• ISSN: 0167-2681; 1879-1751
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.016

•This paper investigates whether and how social preference change mitigates the crowding-out effect that formal insurance has on informal risk sharing.•We find in a lab experiment that the introduction and removal of a temporary and unexpected formal insurance policy surprisingly increases informal risk sharing.•The improvement in informal risk sharing practices occurs mainly in asymmetric cases in which one subject purchases formal insurance but the other does not.•In asymmetric cases, the risk sharing dynamics suggests that those who purchase insurance take the initiative to share more risk for their partners.•We propose a model based on guilt aversion to explain our findings. This paper investigates whether and how the crowding-out effect of formal insurance on informal risk sharing is mitigated by social preference change. We design a lab experiment in which formal insurance is introduced and removed unexpectedly in a repeated risk-sharing game. We find evidence of social preference change by showing that informal risk sharing is significantly improved after the removal of formal insurance, and the pattern mainly occurs when one subject obtains insurance but the other does not. Findings suggest that it is the insurance purchasers who take the initiative to share more risk for their partners. However, there is no significant improvement in informal risk sharing when insurance purchasing decisions are randomly computer generated. We propose a model based on guilt aversion to explain our findings.