Data Quality Analysis of Multi-GNSS Signals and Its Application in Improving Stochastic Model for Precise Orbit Determination

• Published in: Atmosphere Vol. 13; no. 8; p. 1253
• Main Authors: Huang, Chao, Song, Shuli, Cheng, Na, Wang, Zhitao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.08.2022
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Antennas; Artificial satellites in navigation; Computation; Data analysis; Data processing; Empirical analysis; Errors; Global navigation satellite system; Iterative methods; Methods; Modelling; Multi-GNSS; multipath; Navigation; Navigation satellites; Navigation systems; Navigational satellites; Noise; observation noise; Orbit determination; Phase noise; POD; Propagation; Quality assurance; Receivers; Receivers & amplifiers; Satellites; signal; Signal processing; Signal quality; Software; Statistical analysis; Statistical methods; stochastic model; Stochastic models; Stochasticity; China
• ISSN: 2073-4433; 2073-4433
• DOI: 10.3390/atmos13081253

Currently, there are more Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals available for civilians. Many types of GNSS receivers have been updated and several new receivers have been developed for new signals. To know about the performance of these signals and receivers and their stochastic model for data processing, in this study, the data quality of all GNSS signals, especially the new signals are analyzed, and two modified stochastic models with observation noise statistics (STA) and post-fit residuals (RES) are formed. The results show that for all the new signals, the corresponding carrier phase noise is at the same level as other old signals. The pseudorange noise of B2a, L5, E5a, and E5b is within 4 cm and significantly smaller than other signals for receivers without a smooth algorithm, and the multipath error of these signals is about 0.1 m which is also better than other signals. For B1C, the pseudorange multipath error is about 0.4 m, which is close to L1 and E1. Stochastic models are validated for precise orbit determination (POD). Compared with the empirical stochastic model (EMP), both modified models are helpful to reduce the mean unit weight square error and obtain high accuracy orbits with reduced iteration. The 3D orbit accuracy improvement can reach 0.27 cm (7%) for the STA model, and 0.40 cm (10%) for the RES model when compared with the final products from the international GNSS service (IGS). For BDS-3 POD by using B1C and B2a observations, the improvements in the 3D orbit consistency of two adjacent three-day solutions are 0.21 cm (3%) for the STA model and 0.29 cm (4%) for the RES model. In addition, the STA model based on the observation noise of globally distributed stations is less affected by stations with problematic observations and with reduced computation burden.