Prevalence and determinants of metabolic syndrome in Spanish salaried workers: evidence from 15 614 men and women

Abstract Objective To describe the prevalence of Spanish workers with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and those at risk of developing MetS in 2015. Methods Cross-sectional study of workers (n = 15 614). We used a modified definition of the NCEP:ATPIII criteria for MetS (we used body mass index (BMI) above...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of public health (Oxford, England) Vol. 42; no. 1; pp. 141 - 148
Main Authors Matilla-Santander, Nuria, Espinola, Marina, Cartanyà-Hueso, Àurea, Lidón-Moyano, Cristina, González-Marrón, Adrián, Martín-Sánchez, Juan Carlos, Cainzos-Achirica, Miguel, Martínez Sánchez, Jose M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 28.02.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective To describe the prevalence of Spanish workers with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) and those at risk of developing MetS in 2015. Methods Cross-sectional study of workers (n = 15 614). We used a modified definition of the NCEP:ATPIII criteria for MetS (we used body mass index (BMI) above 28.8 kg/m2 instead of the waist circumference criterion). We calculated the prevalence of MetS (having at least three components) and of being at risk of MetS (having one or two components). We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of MetS according to socio-economic and workplace characteristics. Results The proportions of workers with and at risk of MetS were 7.1 and 31.9%, respectively. The most prevalent criterion was having a BMI > 28.8 kg/m2 (24.1%) in men and cHDL < 40 mg/dl in women (12.9%). There were significant associations between MetS and men (aOR compared to women = 3.73, CI 95%: 3.19; 4.36); age (higher among oldest, aOR = 5.75, CI 95%: 4.37;7.56); and social class (higher among lower social class, aOR = 2.03, CI 95%: 1.65;2.48). Conclusion Reducing any of the five MetS components, while taking into account the differences found by socio-economic and workplace characteristics, should be one priority for reducing MetS prevalence.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1741-3842
1741-3850
DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdz003