Supervised physical therapy versus unsupervised exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

To compare the 1-year outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with supervised physical therapy or unsupervised exercise. A single-center randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor and intention-to-treat analysis. Spine care center. A total of 86 patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical rehabilitation Vol. 35; no. 7; p. 964
Main Authors Minetama, Masakazu, Kawakami, Mamoru, Teraguchi, Masatoshi, Kagotani, Ryohei, Mera, Yoshimasa, Sumiya, Tadashi, Nakagawa, Masafumi, Yamamoto, Yoshio, Matsuo, Sachika, Sakon, Nana, Nakatani, Tomohiro, Kitano, Tomoko, Nakagawa, Yukihiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.07.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare the 1-year outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with supervised physical therapy or unsupervised exercise. A single-center randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor and intention-to-treat analysis. Spine care center. A total of 86 patients presenting with symptoms of neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis. The physical therapy group received supervised physical therapy sessions twice a week for 6 weeks and home exercise program. The home exercise group received 6-week home exercise program only. The primary outcome was symptom severity on the Zurich claudication questionnaire at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included physical function, pain, health-related quality of life and the surgery rate after 1 year. At 1 year, more patients in the physical therapy group than in the home exercise group achieved minimum clinically important differences in Zurich claudication questionnaire symptom severity (60.5% vs 32.6%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 4.3, [95% CI [1.5-12.3],  = 0.01); Zurich claudication questionnaire physical function (55.8% vs 32.6%; AOR 3.0 [1.1-8.1],  = 0.03); SF-36 bodily pain (48.8% vs 25.6%; AOR 2.8 [1.1-7.3],  = 0.03), and SF-36 general health (20.9% vs 7.0%; AOR 6.1 [1.1-33.0],  = 0.04). The surgery rate at 1 year was lower in the physical therapy than in the home exercise group (7.0% vs 23.3%; AOR 0.2 [0.04-0.9]  = 0.04). Supervised physical therapy produced greater improvements in symptom severity and physical function than unsupervised exercise and was associated with lower likelihood of receiving surgery within 1 year.
ISSN:1477-0873
DOI:10.1177/0269215520986688