Adaptive governance good practice: Show me the evidence

• Published in: Journal of environmental management Vol. 222; pp. 174 - 184
• Main Authors: Sharma-Wallace, Lisa, Velarde, Sandra J., Wreford, Anita
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 15.09.2018
• Subjects: Adaptive governance; Decision Making; Ecosystem; Environmental governance; Knowledge; Leadership; Social-ecological systems; Systematic literature review; Social-ecological systems; Environmental governance; Adaptive governance; Systematic literature review
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.067

Adaptive governance has emerged in the last decade as an intriguing avenue of theory and practice for the holistic management of complex environmental problems. Research on adaptive governance has flourished since the field's inception, probing the process and mechanisms underpinning the new approach while offering various justifications and prescriptions for empirical use. Nevertheless, recent reviews of adaptive governance reveal some important conceptual and practical gaps in the field, particularly concerning challenges in its application to real-world cases. In this paper, we respond directly to the empirical challenge of adaptive governance, specifically asking: which methods contribute to the implementation of successful adaptive governance process and outcomes in practice and across cases and contexts? We adopt a systematic literature review methodology which considers the current body of empirical literature on adaptive governance of social-ecological systems in order to assess and analyse the methods affecting successful adaptive governance practice across the range of existing cases. We find that methods contributing to adaptive governance in practice resemble the design recommendations outlined in previous adaptive governance scholarship, including meaningful collaboration across actors and scales; effective coordination between stakeholders and levels; building social capital; community empowerment and engagement; capacity development; linking knowledge and decision-making through data collection and monitoring; promoting leadership capacity; and exploiting or creating governance opportunities. However, we critically contextualise these methods by analysing and summarising their patterns-in-use, drawing examples from the cases to explore the specific ways they were successfully or unsuccessfully applied to governance issues on-the-ground. Our results indicate some important underlying shared patterns, trajectories, and lessons learned for evidence-based adaptive governance good practice within and across diverse sectors, issues, and contexts. •We address current gaps in adaptive governance scholarship relating to challenges in its real-world application.•We conduct a systematic review of adaptive governance literature to assess success and failure factors for implementation.•We summarise and contextualise adaptive governance empirical methods by analysing their patterns-in-use.•We note some important shared characteristics and lessons learned for evidence-based adaptive governance good practice.