Final words: cell age and cell cycle are unlinked

Cooper has a simple belief: that the cell cycle is connected to age and size. Furthermore, as a result of this connection in his mind he believes that there are no possible manipulations that can operate on a batch culture to synchronize cells within the cell cycle, such that those cells can undergo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTrends in biotechnology (Regular ed.) Vol. 22; no. 6; pp. 277 - 278
Main Authors Spellman, Paul T, Sherlock, Gavin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2004
Elsevier Science
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cooper has a simple belief: that the cell cycle is connected to age and size. Furthermore, as a result of this connection in his mind he believes that there are no possible manipulations that can operate on a batch culture to synchronize cells within the cell cycle, such that those cells can undergo a semblance of a normal cell cycle. His formulation of this argument is as a ‘fundamental law’, the law of conservation of cell-age order (LCCAO). The first part of this law – ‘there is no batch treatment of the culture that can lead to an alteration of the cell-age order’ – can probably be proved true, in the mathematical sense, and certainly makes intuitive sense. Unfortunately the corollaries of this law are rather suspect, drawing inferences from cell age to cell size to the cell cycle.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Commentary-1
ISSN:0167-7799
1879-3096
DOI:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.012