Reliability and sources of variability of 3D kinematics and electromyography measurements to assess newly-acquired gait in toddlers with typical development and unilateral cerebral palsy

• Published in: Journal of electromyography and kinesiology Vol. 58; p. 102544
• Main Authors: Grigoriu, Anca Irina, Brochard, Sylvain, Sangeux, Morgan, Padure, Liliana, Lempereur, Mathieu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2021
• Subjects: 3D motion analysis; Cerebral palsy; EMG; Reliability; Toddlers; Cerebral palsy; Toddlers; 3D motion analysis; Reliability; EMG
• ISSN: 1050-6411; 1873-5711
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2021.102544

The aim was to 1) determine intersession and intertrial reliability and 2) assess three sources of variability (intersubject, intersession and intertrial) of lower limb kinematic and electromyographic (EMG) variables during gait in toddlers with typical development (TD) and unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) (age <3 years, independent walking experience ≤6 months). Gait kinematics and surface EMG were recorded in 30 toddlers (19 TD and 11 UCP), during two, 3D-motion capture sessions. Standard error of measurement (SEM) between trials (gait cycles) of the same session and between sessions was calculated to assess reliability. Standard deviations (SD) between subjects, sessions and trials were calculated to estimate sources of variability. Sixty-four percent of kinematic SEM-values were acceptable (2°-5°). Frontal plane measurements were most reliable (SEM 2°-4.6°). In toddlers with UCP, EMG variables were most reliable for affected side, distal muscles. Intrinsic (intertrial and intersubject) variability was high, reflecting both motor immaturity and the high variability of toddler gait patterns. In toddlers with UCP, variability was amplified by motor impairment and delayed motor development. 3D gait analysis and surface EMG are partially reliable tools to study individual gait patterns in toddlers in clinical practice and research, although some variables must be interpreted with caution.